As regards the (so called) First Clerk in this Department, Mr M. Entierrez, I concur the new expression ed in your despatch No 5 of 14 January, that he has claim to be treated as though he held the same post as the First Clerk of the Dept. in 1895 who had to perform additional duties since transferred to the Land Dept. But I think that off the pay proper of his past be regarded raised from $1440 to $1728, he has as a matter to retain personal allowance the $450 which he has drawn for some years over and above the ...
As regards the
(so called) First Clerk
in
this Depardment,
Mr M. Entierrez, I con=
eur
224
the new expresse
ed in your despatch
Nr 5 of 14 January,
that he has
claim
to be treated as though
be held the same post as the First (lack
of the Deht. in
1895
who had to perform
additional
557
additional dutres since
transferred to the
Land dept. But I
think that off the hay
proper of his past be
regarded
Co
raised from
$1440 to $1728, he has
A
as a
Mami to retain
personal allowance
the $450 which he
has drawn for
some
years over and above
The
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.